The Richmond the Richmond again.

Kristen Sze just let me know on Assignment 7 that the Richmond district was officially named the Richmond district earlier this week. Thanks Eric Mar! (Story here.)

Now, can you do something about all the random gunshots I've been reading about in the police blotter? Thx.

Musical memory

Music class in grade school amounted to group singalongs. One verse that has stayed with me to this day:

Reuben, Reuben I've been thinking
What the heck have you've been drinking
Looks like water, tastes like wine
Ohmigosh its turpentine

That probably wouldn't fly nowadays, huh?

Messenger bag feature preferences.

In descending order:

  • No velcro closure. It's not classy. Also, should I need to sneak around like a ninja on a museum heist to steal the world's largest diamond, velcro will not do and my fellow ninja-thieves will give me dirty looks in the getaway van. I reject entire brands of bags because of the No Velcro rule.
  • Soft strap. I prefer that seatbelt material. It's easier on my delicate Celestial skin when I'm wearing tank tops. A more pliable strap makes that diagonal boob-crossing a bit more comfortable. (Boob crossing is a funny thought. Imagine the traffic sign.)
  • Back pocket. Useful for stuffing papers in. One popular bag manufacturer goes one step further and puts the organizer in the back pocket rather than under the flap, which I think is BRILLIANT. I never liked the move of sneaking your hand under your flap to get your Fast Pass. It's an inelegant movement, like you're trying to cop a feel off your bag.

Also, I understand that an exterior water bottle pocket isn't aesthetically pleasing in all situations, but could all bag manufacturers everywhere start creating an interior pocket or elastic strap for water bottles? I hate it when my bottle flops over and I have to dig dig dig it out for sweet refreshment.

Idea for SFBC.

I was reading an opinion that car culture is not the reason why people won't ride bikes; it's bike culture, which is filled with elitist douches of either the spandex or skinny jean varieties. I gotta agree with that. (Though, being run over by Muni also discourages me plenty, too.)

So, I think to myself, what would de-douche-ify bike culture sufficiently for your average-panted Joe or Jane? Answer: nuns on bikes. Who doesn't love this?

photo courtesy of keepwaddling1

You look at a 70-year-old nun on a bike and you think, maybe, just maybe this is within your capabilities. Also, cars will be more watchful of cyclists with the threat of eternal damnation.

Yes, sir, we have no bananas...

I return to blogging to complain a little: I bought the Babycakes cookbook last week because Steve's lactose-intolerant and I'm lactose-sensitive-ish and we love cake and vegan baking is new and enticing and promising to me, so cookbooks in this genre are interesting.

Also, the book is beautiful. Four color and glossy pages! Photos of all the recipes! And, for reasons unknown to me, it has really posed, cheesecake photos of the founder and her co-bakers. Like, their hair is all did and they're eyeing the camera suggestively as they frost cupcakes in their matching 50s uniforms, as if they employed only sexy ladies and no Mexican labor in the kitchen at all. (Which could be true, I've never been to the bakery.)

Babycakes is, I derive from the text, a dairy-free, gluten-free bakery in Manhattan that celebrities love. I decided to try the banana bread recipe first because a) cupcakes are labor-intensive and I just wanted to whip something up quick; and b) Mary Louise Parker with too much makeup on endorses it on the facing page.

It calls for a lot of funky ingredients, and I was briefly tempted to just use regular flour because we don't have gluten allergies. However, the introduction explicitly warns to follow the recipe as closely as possible. Tom Colicchio, who wrote the foreword, said if I followed the recipe exactly, it'd be a winner every time. That's two warnings! I'm no fool.

So, I went to our local hippie health store and got the gluten-free flour and the agave nectar and the xanthum gum and the coconut oil. It was not cheap, but the healthy choice rarely is.

Two questions came to me during preparation: it calls for 6 mashed bananas, I just used 5, and I still had enough banana slop to fill a small mixing bowl. Do I really use all of this? Well, I'd better, or Collichio will be on my tail.

Steve: "It'd be better if they gave a measurement rather than the number of bananas."

Stacy: "Ya, but if you're going to the grocery store, you're not going to know how many bananas units equal 1 c. of mashed."

B #2: coconut oil is an ingredient I've never used, and its solid at room temperature. Am I supposed to melt this before measuring it out? Maybe its supposed to remain solid and I just need to whip it really well to incorporate? I used it solid since there was no instruction to do otherwise.

Results: way too moist to be called a bread or cake. It had a really hard time firming up in the baking time it instructed (35 minutes.) I'm pretty sure it was the combination of too many bananas and my incorrect decision to use the coconut oil solid. Tasty and edible, yes, but hardly bread like: more like a banana bread pudding.

I Googled to see if there was an errata list already, and learned on the Babycakes blog that the cookbook authors now recommend 1.5 c. of mashed bananas, or roughly 3 bananas. That's HALF of what was printed in the book!

Reading through the same blog post comments, I see that people have been having problems with the other recipes. The frosting didn't set up in the refrigerator properly for some people, and we learn on Martha Stewart's website (Babycakes did a cooking demo on the show) that a different proportion of ingredients is necessary. Lots of people want substitutes for the bean flours because the bean flavor is undesirable to them.

I'm getting this feeling these recipes weren't home-tested properly, and that's really unfortunate because successful baking depends on precision.

I feel for these ladies at Babycakes, though. Reading through the comments on the blog has given me an education on food allergies and its clear they cannot please everyone when you have some readers saying they are on a gluten-free, dairy-free, sugar-free and nightshade-free diet, but still want delicious cake.

The loudest complaint seems to be that half of the recipes use spelt flour, which is not gluten-free, and the cookbook proclaims loudly on the cover that it is a gluten-free cookbook. That seems a legitimate complaint to me.

Still, half the fun of cooking is expermentation, so I'm not chucking it right away. I'm just hoping they do the decent thing and come out with an official errata list or something because, honestly, 3 bananas instead of 6 is an error, and its not enough to bury the correction in your blog.